Jas Gajaria Posted September 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gaurav said: Yes, It's same 6G74 DOHC 3.5 Engine that comes in Pajero EVO BUT BUT BUT without Mivec head that could make this stock engine from 225 HP to 260 HP. So Im half lucky, as I can't register Pajero EVO here in UAE (right hand). Who is putting this crappiest idea in your mind....? I'm seriously curious to know. Rebore, 3.8 to 4.1 for fuel economy.....? It's going to suck more fuel buddy. Half Lucky still good! When I increase power, I won’t feel the need to push the car as hard trying to accelerate. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 For more instant acceleration with "marginal" power gain I will suggest: Straight free flow exhaust pipe Borla or Magnaflow muffler. K&N filter Platinum spark plugs Relatively cheaper, no long term damage and RTA friendly mods to give you at least 75% on what you want. 1 1 Let's root for each other & watch each other grow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas Gajaria Posted September 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 Just now, Jas Gajaria said: Half Lucky still good! When I increase power, I won’t feel the need to push the car as hard trying to accelerate. Same way like the Range Rover, I too have a RRSC, that gives me 500Km on 70 liter tank and Pajero 300 on 60 liter. RR has 5.0 but becuase of less throttle to get you at speed you save fuel 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 I have had the sluggish Pajero (Trademark) acceleration issue too and after doing all of the above I felt a big difference and finally settle for this much as they are reversible and RTA friendly. 2 Let's root for each other & watch each other grow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Jas Gajaria said: Same way like the Range Rover, I too have a RRSC, that gives me 500Km on 70 liter tank and Pajero 300 on 60 liter. RR has 5.0 but becuase of less throttle to get you at speed you save fuel Range Rover is a different engineering and you can't compare them with Japanese TBH. Secondly, V8 is always better in fuel mileage than V6 if you do lot of highway miles. Here are my ex and present cars average fuel economy: Porsche Cayenne 4.2 V8 Turbo - 18.7L/100 Mustang V8 5.0 - 13.9L/100 Range Rover 5.0 Supercharged - 17.1L/100 Trailblazer 4.2 - V6 - 16.3L/100 Pajero 3.5 - V6 - 18.8 L/100 1 Let's root for each other & watch each other grow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow79 Posted September 5, 2019 Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 plus the gearing ratios and number of gears that matter 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts